Let me give another example to show Carroll's dishonesty and specific motivations: When everyone was debating TikTok/ByteDance, it should have been an ideal time for someone concerned with theories related to foreign influence on Americans to take advantage and expose stuff. There is an insane amount of evidence suggesting the CCP, and specifically their intelligence agencies, are using TikTok for data collection and to influence Americans. That would seem right up Ian's alley if he was concerned about those issues. But he instead went all-in claiming there was nothing there re China. Instead, he insisted (falsely) that Larry Ellison controlled TikTok's algorithm (thus trying to create a Jewish angle- as he does every time). Of course Ellison has nothing to do with TikTok's algorithm. Oracle stores TikTok data for U.S. users, but the algorithm is fully guarded by the parent company in China. .
See Tweet