If you consult any legitimate source, it will tell you that calling Jesus a “Palestinian Jew” is both incorrect and anachronistic. What he was was a Judean Jew, of the tribe of Judah, one of the 12 Tribes of Israel. Yes, he was indigenous, as all Jews are to Judea. The intentional disinformation campaigns are not because they are confused or mistaken—if they had more than 4 IQ points they likely looked it up and quickly had their revisionist myths debunked—it’s that Jesus’s indigineity confirms Jewish indigeneity to Jewish land, not Roman, Arab, or other conqueror’s lands. Because their entire argument is rooted in indigeneity, and indigeneity affording a people exclusive right to a land (which is a faulty argument to begin with, I’ve long argued that the transient demographic of the land have laid down their roots over time), their entire movement collapses with the realization of Jewish indigeneity. No more justification for “intifada.” No more justification for “river to the sea.” Importantly, no more justification to accuse Jews of the greatest evil of our time—which adapts according to each new permutation of Nazi ideology in accordance to that zeitgeist’s “evil”—colonization. At bottom, this is what it comes down to. Each new generation becoming flustered and distressed when facts and history handcuff their ability to engage in the virulent antisemitism they feed off. Jesus and Mary were Jewish Israelites. Cope. Or should I say… starve.
See Tweet