Grady Booch
"We’re publishing this work because we believe we have a responsibility to disclose malicious misuse of our services. As models become increasingly capable, their risks will increase, unless AI developers and society’s defenders act to make them safer." Two things: -- As the Claudefathers, you ARE one of those very "AI developers". While I respect your admittedly selective transparency, what is @anthropicAI doing "to make them safer" given that the "them" doing these harms to which you refer is the very thing you built? -- While I celebrate that you disrupted these activities, that does not disavow you of the responsibility that material harm was in fact done and continues to be done.
Anthropic
We're publishing our most detailed threat intelligence report to date. It covers how people tried to misuse Claude—for cyberattacks, influence operations, surveillance, biology, and building weapons—and how we found and stopped them. We disrupted every operation in the report, and used the lessons from them to strengthen our safeguards. Where appropriate, we also shared what we found with authorities and other AI companies. These cases are not typical: we’re highlighting some of the most sophisticated misuse we’ve seen. But they’re especially important to discuss, because they show us where AI misuse is headed, where our safeguards work, and where they need to improve. We’re publishing this report so others can spot the same activity on their own platforms, and so we can give the public a clearer view of how emerging threats develop. Read the report: https://www.anthropic.com/threat-intelligence-report-september-2026