Richard McElreath 🐈‍⬛

Richard McElreath 🐈‍⬛

@rlmcelreath · Twitter ·

Professor Bright is one of the treasures I started following bc of his unparalleled poasting. Just poasting from the 6th dimension. But his scholarship is always worth a read. Super thoughtful person forcing me to either defend my views or yield to his points

lastpositivist

@lastpositivist · Twitter ·

I have a new paper out! It'll please nobody. It is a defence of standpoint epistemology that fans of standpoint epistemology will not think is real standpoint epistemology but enemies will think is indeed. Yay! Official link: https://academic.oup.com/monist/article/107/1/82/7560245 Free: https://www.liamkofibright.com/uploads/4/8/9/8/48985425/du_boisian_leadership_through_standpoint_epistemology.pdf

I outline a defence of a naive group-level standpoint epistemology. According to this view then under conditions often met in real situations of oppression, it is the majority view on questions of import to those marginalised by oppression that ought to be treated as deference worthy. I further argue that this view is inspired by and coheres well with various doctrines laid out and defended by W.E.B. Du Bois, making this a recognisably Duboisian vision of standpoint epistemology. The central conceptual move is to relate principles of social epistemology under conditions of oppression that were of great interest to Du Bois with the conditions for group accuracy that have been studied by social-choice theorists working on Condorcet’s Jury Theorem, as well as contemporary epistemological work on group polarisation. I argue that once these elements are brought together a surprisingly cogent case for deference to the simple majority view of the marginalised can often be made.