In reply to @michael_hoerger

Mike Hoerger, PhD MSCR MBA

Mike Hoerger, PhD MSCR MBA

@michael_hoerger · Twitter ·

The CDC recently downshifted the categories and colors it uses to describe all current and historical COVlD levels. Our state stables show both, and the interactive map allows you to toggle to the version you prefer. THREAD (5/5) 🧵 https://x.com/michael_hoerger/status/2089089290089181242

Mike Hoerger, PhD MSCR MBA

Mike Hoerger, PhD MSCR MBA

🚨BREAKING 🦠 On Friday, the US CDC arbitrarily shifted higher COVlD levels into lower categories depicted with cooler colors. Much of what was Very High is now "High." What was High is now "Moderate" or "Low." Low is "Very Low." 🔹2 states/territories artificially shifted from High to Moderate (MS, GU) 🔹5 shifted from Moderate to Low (CA, TX, AK, WA, NV) 🔹4 shifted from Low to Very Low (AZ, AR, LA, NC) During intense surges, states will rarely get classified as Very High anymore. Presently, transmission is rising across the US, with a 75% chance of a wave, but states will be depicted in blue (Very Low) much longer, making communities less prepared. #Bluewashing Normally, when the CDC makes a methodology change, they flag it prominently on each of their COVlD monitoring pages. This time, there was no alert and no explanation. Major changes were confined to COVlD, not Influenza A, and not RSV. The questionable change was made in the middle of rising transmission across most of the country; 15 states already have COVlD outbreaks, and others may soon join the ranks. These are serious ethics concerns that warrant investigative journalism. These issues are aggravated by delayed reporting at High/Very High monitoring sites. Sites with 1-week reporting delays get excluded when the CDC calculates current levels. For example, only 16% of the sites online in Texas (3 of 19) report High/Very High levels, but 90% of those with a 1-week reporting delay (18 of 20) have High/Very High levels, leading the state to get classified as "Low" when really High. These issues snowball and can easily push a state down 1-2 categories when experiencing significant COVlD outbreaks. The good news is that the individual wastewater monitoring site data are still valid. The bad news is that the CDC maps and level descriptions will now mislead the casual user. Think: "Good data, bad use of data." At PMC, we told you that if there was any funny business at the CDC, we would warn you right away. We diagnosed the issue immediately and will still report accurate COVlD information. Expect further national news coverage this week. Journalists are welcome to reach out.

Alabama	High
Alaska	High
Arizona	Very High
Arkansas	Moderate*
California	High
Colorado	Very Low
Connecticut	Low
Delaware	Very Low
District of Columbia	Moderate
Florida	High
Georgia	Moderate
Guam	High
Hawaii	Very High
Idaho	Very Low
Illinois	Very Low
Indiana	Very Low
Iowa	Very Low
Kansas	Low
Kentucky	Moderate
Louisiana	High
Maine	Very Low
Maryland	Low
Massachusetts	Very Low
Michigan	Very Low
Minnesota	Very Low
Mississippi	Very High*
Missouri	Low
Montana	Very High*
Nebraska	Very Low
Nevada	High
New Hampshire	Low
New Jersey	Very Low
New Mexico	Moderate
New York	Very Low*
North Carolina	Moderate
North Dakota	Moderate*
Ohio	Very Low
Oklahoma	Low*
Oregon	Moderate
Pennsylvania	Very Low
Puerto Rico	High*
Rhode Island	Very Low
South Carolina	Very Low*
South Dakota	Very Low
Tennessee	Moderate
Texas	Very High
U.S. Virgin Islands	High
Utah	Very Low
Vermont	Very Low
Virginia	Very Low
Washington	High
West Virginia	Very Low
Wisconsin	Very Low
Wyoming	Very Low
Screenshot of interactive map again